Comparisons C O M P A R I S O N S DOWNLOAD THERMAL MASS COST COMPARISON SHEET (.pdf) Thermal Track™ Versus... CEMENT/GYPSUM WARMBOARD T H E R M A L   T R A C K™   - V S -    C E M E N T / G Y P S U M TOP Thermal Track™'s thin profile makes it excellent for retrofits Thermal Track™ is excellent for small projects, whereas cement and gypsum are impractical and expensive in the same circumstances Many jobs are lost due to resistance to pouring slabs or thin slabs that would not be lost with Thermal Track™ Thermal Track™ can be installed in cold weather without fear of freezing Double plating adds about 18 cents a square foot to the cost of a home and is needed with thin slab pours Many jobs are lost to perception of slow response time of cement systems. Thermal Track™ accelerates rapidly and is appropriate for control with a simple setback thermostat or can be remotely controlled for weekend use Scheduling of Thermal Track™ can be more closely controlled, no trucks to wait for! T H E R M A L   T R A C K™    - V S -    W A R M B O A R D TOP Thermal Track™ can go in later in a project, thus reducing time that piping is exposed to damage Thermal Track™ is more cost-effective Pipe is not run under walls with Thermal Track™ Thermal Track™ is easily utilized in retrofits Thermal Track™ is easier to cut and custom routing is easier than with Warmboard

© Thermal Track™, 2002. All rights reserved. Patent Pending.